Skip to Main Content

Insight

04/03/2018

Settlement Deal Leaves Status Quo On Joint-Employer Test

Republished with permission, this article first appeared in Law360, March 30, 2018.

On March 20, 2018, the National Labor Relations Board announced that franchisor McDonald’s USA LLC agreed to settle numerous high-profile labor disputes over whether it is a joint employer with its franchisees. Although the settlement has not yet been approved by the administrative law judge overseeing the litigation, McDonald’s and its franchisees negotiated settlement agreements with the NLRB and the charging parties to resolve alleged unfair labor practice charges without admitting liability or wrongdoing. In doing so, McDonald’s avoids prolonged litigation and a potentially adverse decision that would have had sweeping ramifications for franchisors and their franchisees nationwide.

Please see full Publication for more information: McDonald’s Deal Leaves Status Quo On Joint-Employer Test.


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.